search

Strong Kirchheimer vs Tom Fawcett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Fawcett analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Strong Kirchheimer vs Tom Fawcett Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 1 Fawcett

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 50.88% of points on their second serve, while Fawcett has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 48.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fawcett has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 61.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fawcett has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 49.18% of matches played (W/L 30/ 31), with Fawcett winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 153/ 119). Fawcett has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Fawcett has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Fawcett being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 2 and Fawcett winning 2. The last match between Kirchheimer and Fawcett was at the M15 Champaign, 07-06-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:30.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Fawcett have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kirchheimer winning 0 times and Fawcett 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 0, and Fawcett 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.05 while Fawcett has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fawcett has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fawcett has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Strong Kirchheimer

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

493

Rank

375

High

29

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

1

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

440

High

28

Age

R

Plays

Tom Fawcett

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

1

Total

1

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W W L W W W L W L

Form

L L L W W L L W W L

56% (279-217)

Career Total W/L

55% (86-69)

46% (12-14)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$3,990

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Strong Kirchheimer vs Tom Fawcett For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kirchheimer VS Fawcett

Kirchheimer VS Fawcett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Strong Kirchheimer Tom Fawcett
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 2 2
Games Won 22 21
Aces (Total) 2 1
DFs Total 3 11
Avg Match Time 1:0:30 1:0:30
1st Serve % 69% (49/71) 56% (47/84)
1st Serve Win% 61% (30/49) 55% (26/47)
2nd Serve Win% 59% (13/22) 41% (15/37)
BPs Won% (Total) 28% (5/18) 22% (2/9)
Return Points W% 51% (43/84) 39% (28/71)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)

Kirchheimer VS Fawcett H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Tom Fawcett
69% ( 49 of 71)
1st Serve %
56% ( 47 of 84)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 15 of 37)
28% ( 5 of 18)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
39% ( 28 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 43 of 84)
86
Total Points Won
69
7-5 7-5

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Strong Kirchheimer Tom Fawcett
YTD W/L 46% (12/14) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 51% (31/30) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 50% (279/282) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 57% (8/6) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 33% (2/4) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 33% (2/4) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.41 0
Aces Total 111 0
DFs per game 0.26 0
DFs Total 71 0
Avg Match Time 1:49:36 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 314.85 0
1st Serve % 62% (1093/1773) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 70% (762/1093) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 51% (346/680) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 40% (66/165) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 38% (680/1797) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 44% (7/9) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 50% (5/5) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 46% (12/26) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (3/6) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 22% (2/9) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 67% (15/10) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 33% (15/5) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 18% (11/2) 0% (0/0)

Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Aadarsh Tripathi
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
47% ( 48 of 103)
1st Serve %
66% ( 65 of 99)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 44 of 65)
53% ( 29 of 55)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 15 of 34)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
41% ( 42 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 40 of 99)
101
Total Points Won
101
L
2-6 7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
63% ( 40 of 64)
1st Serve %
45% ( 30 of 66)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 32 of 66)
73
Total Points Won
57
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
52% ( 22 of 42)
1st Serve %
58% ( 28 of 48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 12 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 25 of 48)
55
Total Points Won
35
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Collin Altamirano
65% ( 31 of 48)
1st Serve %
56% ( 32 of 57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
76% ( 13 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 11 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 30 of 57)
67
Total Points Won
38
W
6-0 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Colton Smith
56% ( 44 of 78)
1st Serve %
71% ( 58 of 82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66% ( 29 of 44)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 31 of 58)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
41% ( 32 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 41 of 82)
87
Total Points Won
73
W
7-6(3) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Bryce Nakashima
60% ( 24 of 40)
1st Serve %
58% ( 31 of 53)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
75% ( 12 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
28% ( 11 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
57
Total Points Won
36
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60% ( 31 of 52)
1st Serve %
51% ( 28 of 55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 18 of 28)
57% ( 12 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
27% ( 14 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 25 of 55)
63
Total Points Won
44
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Leo Borg
57% ( 28 of 49)
1st Serve %
69% ( 50 of 72)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 28 of 50)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 34 of 72)
69
Total Points Won
52
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Andres Urrea
56% ( 22 of 39)
1st Serve %
59% ( 30 of 51)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86% ( 19 of 22)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 20 of 30)
82% ( 14 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
15% ( 6 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
56
Total Points Won
34
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Axel Nefve
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59% ( 38 of 64)
1st Serve %
64% ( 44 of 69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
84% ( 32 of 38)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 32 of 44)
65% ( 17 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
23% ( 15 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 24 of 69)
73
Total Points Won
60
L
6-4 7-6(3) H2H

Tom Fawcett Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Adam Walton
Player
Tom Fawcett
59% ( 26 of 44)
1st Serve %
60% ( 31 of 52)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
77% ( 20 of 26)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
78% ( 14 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 10 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 27 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
35
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Tom Fawcett
Player
Kareem Allaf
60% ( 46 of 77)
1st Serve %
48% ( 41 of 86)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
63% ( 29 of 46)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 30 of 41)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 24 of 45)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
43% ( 33 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 32 of 86)
76
Total Points Won
87
W
0-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Tom Fawcett
Player
Drew Baird
60% ( 49 of 81)
1st Serve %
53% ( 37 of 70)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 28 of 37)
56% ( 18 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
36% ( 29 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 29 of 70)
81
Total Points Won
70
W
6-4 7-6(3) H2H
QF
cross
Felix Corwin
Player
Tom Fawcett
64% ( 46 of 72)
1st Serve %
55% ( 45 of 82)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
38% ( 10 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
40% ( 29 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 37 of 82)
80
Total Points Won
74
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Tom Fawcett
69% ( 49 of 71)
1st Serve %
56% ( 47 of 84)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 15 of 37)
28% ( 5 of 18)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
39% ( 28 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 43 of 84)
86
Total Points Won
69
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Tom Fawcett
Player
Reese Stalder
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve %
64% ( 38 of 59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
36% ( 5 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 28 of 59)
62
Total Points Won
45
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Tom Fawcett
Player
Daniel Fainblum
63% ( 44 of 70)
1st Serve %
51% ( 34 of 67)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 24 of 34)
38% ( 10 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
41% ( 29 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 28 of 67)
69
Total Points Won
68
W
1-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Henry Craig
Player
Tom Fawcett
63% ( 41 of 65)
1st Serve %
63% ( 31 of 49)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78% ( 32 of 41)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 24 of 31)
42% ( 10 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
17% ( 1 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 15 of 48)
57
Total Points Won
56
L
6-3 4-6 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Tom Fawcett
49% ( 27 of 55)
1st Serve %
67% ( 45 of 67)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
43% ( 12 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
40% ( 22 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 33 of 67)
66
Total Points Won
56
L
7-6(1) 4-2 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Karue Sell
Player
Tom Fawcett
57% ( 38 of 67)
1st Serve %
55% ( 27 of 49)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 17 of 27)
59% ( 17 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
31% ( 21 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 20 of 49)
66
Total Points Won
50
L
6-2 6-4 H2H

Kirchheimer Vs Fawcett Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Kirchheimer are available here and Fawcett photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions